Gabriel Zucman | Clausen Center

Gabriel Zucman

Assistant Professor

Economics

Gabriel Zucman is assistant professor in the Economics Department at the University of California Berkeley. His research focuses on economic inequality and tax heavens.  He earned his PhD from the Paris School of Economics in 2013 receiving the French Economic Association's award for best PhD dissertation in 2014. He worked as assistant professor of economics at the London School of Economics prior to joining Berkeley. Since 2015, he has worked as Co-Director of the World Wealth and Income Database (WID), a database aiming at the provision of access to extensive data series on the world distribution of income and wealth.

 

Summary of recent papers

Tax Evasion and Inequality

Date: May 28, 2017

Coauthors: Annette Alstadsæter (Norwegian University of Life Sciences), and Niels Johannesen (University of Copenhagen)

Citation: Working Paper

In this paper, Zucman and coathours attempt to estimate the size and distribution of tax evasion in rich countries. They combine stratified random audits—the key source used to study tax evasion so far—with new micro-data leaked from two large offshore financial institutions, HSBC Switzerland (“Swiss leaks”) and Mossack Fonseca (“Panama Papers”). They match these data to population-wide wealth records in Norway, Sweden, and Denmark. They find that tax evasion rises sharply with wealth, a phenomenon that random audits fail to capture. On average about 3% of personal taxes are evaded in Scandinavia, but this figure rises to about 30% in the top 0.01% of the wealth distribution, a group that includes households with more than $40 million in net wealth. A simple model of the supply of tax evasion services can explain why evasion rises steeply with wealth. Taking tax evasion into account increases the rise in inequality seen in tax data since the 1970s markedly, highlighting the need to move beyond tax data to capture income and wealth at the top, even in countries where tax compliance is generally high. They also find that after reducing tax evasion—by using tax amnesties—tax evaders do not legally avoid taxes more. This result suggests that fighting tax evasion can be an effective way to collect more tax revenue from the ultra-wealthy.

 

Distributional National Accounts: Methods and Estimates for the United States
 
Date July 2017
 
Coauthors: Thomas Piketty (Paris School of Economics), Emmanuel Saez (UC Berkeley)
 
Citation, R&R Quarterly Journal of Economics
 

This paper combines tax, survey, and national accounts data to estimate the distribution of national income in the United States since 1913. Our distributional national accounts capture 100% of national income, allowing us to compute growth rates for each quantile of the income distribution consistent with macroeconomic growth. We estimate the distribution of both pre-tax and post-tax income, making it possible to provide a comprehensive view of how government redistribution affects inequality. Average pre-tax real national income per adult has increased 60% since 1980, but we find that it has stagnated for the bottom 50% of the distribution at about $16,000 a year. The pre-tax income of the middle class—adults between the median and the 90th percentile—has grown 40% since 1980, faster than what tax and survey data suggest, due in particular to the rise of tax-exempt fringe benefits. Income has boomed at the top. The upsurge of top incomes was first a labor income phenomenon but has mostly been a capital income phenomenon since 2000. The government has offset only a small fraction of the increase in inequality. The reduction of the gender gap in earnings has mitigated the increase in inequality among adults, but the share of women falls steeply as one moves up the labor income distribution, and is only 11% in the top 0.1% in 2014.

 

Clausen-Supported Research